First Commonwealth Financial Corp
NYSE:FCF
Decide at what price you'd be comfortable buying and we'll help you stay ready.
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
|
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US |
|
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US |
|
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
Q4-2025 Earnings Call
AI Summary
Earnings Call on Jan 28, 2026
EPS Beat: Core EPS for Q4 was $0.43 per share, beating consensus estimates.
Margin Expansion: Net interest margin increased to 3.98%, with guidance for around 4% by end of 2026.
Loan & Deposit Growth: Average loans grew 1.2% and deposits 2.8% QoQ; annualized loan growth was 8.2%.
Provision Decrease: Provision for credit losses dropped by $4.3 million to $7 million as a problem loan nears resolution.
Share Buybacks: $23.1 million in stock repurchased in Q4; buyback activity expected to continue in 2026.
Expense Control: Core efficiency ratio at 52.8%; OpEx expected to increase about 3% in 2026.
Loan Sale: $225 million commercial loan portfolio held for sale, expected to improve liquidity and capital ratios.
Stable Credit Outlook: Net charge-off guidance for 2026 remains 25–30 bps; credit reserves seen as strong.
First Commonwealth Financial posted strong Q4 results, highlighted by core EPS of $0.43 per share, which exceeded consensus estimates. The core return on assets (ROA) reached 1.45% and return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) was 15.83%. Management emphasized solid year-over-year improvements in pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue (PPNR), core EPS, ROA, and efficiency.
Net interest margin (NIM) expanded to 3.98% in Q4, helped by healthy new commercial loan volume and lower deposit costs. Despite some variable-rate loan headwinds, management expects a temporary dip in Q1 followed by gradual increases, ending 2026 at around 4% NIM.
Loans grew 1.2% QoQ and 8.2% annualized (5% excluding Center Bank acquisition), driven by commercial banking, equipment finance, and indirect lending. Deposits rose 2.8% QoQ and 6.1% for the year. Management expects mid-single digit loan growth to continue in 2026 with a healthy pipeline.
Provision for credit losses dropped to $7 million, down $4.3 million from Q3, as a previously troubled dealer floor plan loan nears resolution. Net charge-off guidance for 2026 is unchanged at 25–30 basis points, and reserve levels remain strong and in line or ahead of peers at 1.32%.
Core noninterest expense increased $1.7 million in Q4, mainly from filling open positions and some contract terminations. However, the efficiency ratio remained strong at 52.8%. Management expects cost increases to be limited to about 3% year-over-year in 2026.
The company repurchased $23.1 million of stock in Q4 and has additional buyback capacity authorized, with plans to continue repurchases using excess capital. Actual buyback pace will depend on share price and capital generation, but management plans to be active as conditions allow.
About $225 million in Philadelphia-area commercial loans were moved to held-for-sale status, with a buyer in talks. If sold, proceeds will be reinvested in lower-yielding securities, which will benefit liquidity and capital ratios but may create a 1.5% rate differential.
Fee income was flat in Q4 as SBA gains offset seasonal declines in wealth and mortgage. Fee income made up 18% of total revenue, which management sees as favorable versus peers. Noninterest income is expected to be flat in 2026, with efforts ongoing to grow fee businesses.
Thank you for standing by. My name is Jordan, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the First Commonwealth Financial Corporation Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Release Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Thank you.
I'd now like to turn the call over to Ryan Thomas, Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Jordan, and good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for joining us today to discuss First Commonwealth Financial Corporation's fourth quarter financial results. Participating on today's call will be Mike Price, President and CEO; and Jim Reske, Chief Financial Officer; Jane Grebenc, Bank President and Chief Revenue Officer; Brian Sohocki, Chief Credit Officer; and Mike McCuen, Chief Lending Officer.
As a reminder, a copy of yesterday's earnings release can be accessed by logging on to fcbanking.com and selecting the Investor Relations link at the top of the page. We have also included a slide presentation on our Investor Relations website with supplemental information that will be referenced during today's call.
Before we begin, I need to caution listeners that this call will contain forward-looking statements. Please refer to our forward-looking statements disclaimer on Page 3 of the slide presentation for a description of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements.
Today's call will also include non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to and not as an alternative for our reported results prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these measures can be found in the appendix of today's slide presentation.
With that, I will turn the call over to Mike.
Thank you, Ryan, and welcome, everyone. Headline performance numbers for the fourth quarter include core EPS of $0.43 per share, which beat consensus earnings estimates alongside a net interest margin that expanded to 3.98% and a core ROA of 1.45% and a core efficiency ratio of 52.8%.
During the fourth quarter, average deposits and total loans grew modestly at 2.8% and 1.2%, respectively, due to seasonal headwinds and several larger commercial loan payoffs. Net interest income grew as the margin expanded on the heels of healthy new commercial loan volume at good rates.
Deposit costs fell 1 basis point to 1.83%. Fee income was flat as gains in SBA were offset by seasonal declines in wealth and mortgage. Our fee income at 18% of total revenue compares favorably to peers, and we have a concerted effort and long-term focus on growing fee income through our regional banking model. Wages and incentives remain pressured due to market conditions.
The provision for credit losses decreased by $4.3 million compared to last quarter to $7 million. The elevated prior quarter provision was reflective of the continued resolution of a previously disclosed dealer floor plan credit. The credit required no further reserve in the fourth quarter, while NPLs increased 4 basis points to 94 basis points, versus the prior quarter, we are appropriately reserved for these loans and do not experience a provision impact like the third quarter.
Non-performing loans include both the unguaranteed portion of SBA loans and the government guaranteed portion of any SBA loan, which is owned by the bank. As of December 31, 2025, $98 million of nonperforming loans included $39.2 million of total SBA loans, of which $31.2 million was government guaranteed. As a result of our -- our 94 basis points of NPLs, 32 basis points is guaranteed.
In the fourth quarter, we repurchased $23.1 million of our stock or 1.4 million shares at $15.94 per share. We repurchased 2.1 million shares in total in 2025, which incidentally is roughly 2/3 of the 3 million shares we issued in the Center Bank acquisition.
For the year, core EPS of $1.53 compares favorably to the consensus earnings estimates of $1.40 that was in place in December of 2024 as well as the highest revised midyear consensus estimate of $1.54. Net interest income of $427.5 million in 2025 was up at an impressive $47.2 million year-over-year, while net interest income benefited in general from higher for longer interest rates, more specifically, net interest income was driven by better loan yields, good loan volumes, lower deposit costs and a better commercial business mix. All this mix together drove the NIM markedly higher over last year.
Loan growth was 8.2% annualized and 5% without the Center Bank acquisition as commercial banking, equipment finance and indirect led the way. Average deposit growth of 6.1% for the year largely kept pace with loan growth and was approximately 4.2% without Center Bank.
Here, money market and CDs accounted for over $534 million in growth, while noninterest-bearing DDA added another $116 million to a now $10.3 billion depository. For the year, noninterest income fell only $3 million year-over-year despite another $6.3 million in Durbin amendment debit card headwinds that resulted from crossing $10 billion in assets.
In short, our fee businesses are filling the gap. In sum, 2025 was a year in which strong growth in spread and fee income more than offset the impact of higher expenses and lost Durbin interchange income, resulting in year-over-year improvements in PPNR, core EPS, core ROA and efficiency. During the year, and by the way, the team completed the acquisition of Center Bank and grew deposits 3% annually for the year.
Before I turn the call over to Jim, I wanted to take a moment to recognize Jane Grebenc, who will be retiring at the end of March. Jane has been a friend and a mentor to me and many other leaders throughout her distinguished career, and she has left an indelible mark on First Commonwealth. Jane's dedication, leadership and wisdom have played a pivotal role in the strategic transformation that have helped position First Commonwealth as a top quartile performer. Thank you, Jane.
And with that, I will turn it over to Jim Reske, our CFO.
Thanks, Mike. Core operating results for the fourth quarter of 2025 continued the momentum of the third quarter. Core ROA improved 11 basis points to 1.45%. The core ROTCE improved 93 basis points to 15.83%. Spread income increased $2.1 million from the previous quarter, primarily due to a 6 basis point increase in the net interest margin. The yield on earning assets increased 3 basis points, while the cost of funds decreased 3 basis points.
Looking ahead, our NIM guidance is little changed from last quarter, a near-term dip as our margin through our variable rate loans, fully reflects fourth quarter rate cuts followed by gradual improvement each quarter ending the year 2026 at around 4%.
At year-end, we designated a portfolio of approximately $225 million in commercial loans as held for sale. These loans represent a pool of commercial loans that were originated primarily in our Philadelphia MSA, which the bank had previously decided to exit in order to focus the bank's resources on customers in other areas.
Subsequent to the acquisition and communication to borrowers, a bank approached us with an offer to purchase the portfolio. Since discussions regarding a sale are ongoing, we move the portfolio to held for sale as of year-end. The ongoing effect in 2026, should the sale be consummated, would be to reinvest the cash proceeds from the sale of $225 million in loans into lower yielding securities at a rate differential of approximately 1.5%. The sale of consummated will also have the ancillary benefits of improving our liquidity and our capital ratios.
As Mike mentioned, total average deposits increased $72 million or 2.8% annualized over last quarter. Seasonal outflows in public funds were more than offset by growth in consumer checking and time deposits along with growth in small business and corporate money market costs.
Core noninterest income of $24.3 million decreased $200,000 from the previous quarter. SBA gain on sale income increased by $800,000, but this was more than offset by a $700,000 decrease in wealth advisory fees and a $200,000 decrease in swap fees.
In 2026, we expect noninterest income to be relatively flat over 2025. So longer term, as Mike mentioned, we would expect our regional model to improve fee income results.
Core noninterest expense of $74.3 million increased $1.7 million from the previous quarter, mostly due to increases in salaries and benefits as we filled a number of open positions in the fourth quarter. The bank, however, was able to achieve positive operating leverage over last quarter. The core efficiency ratio remained below [ 53% ], and we expect to be able to limit operating cost increases to approximately 3% and year-over-year looking ahead.
Mike mentioned our buyback activity in the fourth quarter. I would add that remaining repurchase capacity under the current program was $22.7 million as of December 31, 2025. On top of that, an additional $25 million of share repurchase authority was authorized by our Board yesterday. Of course, we only repurchased shares using excess capital generation in any given quarter, which effectively caps repurchase activity at approximately $25 million to $30 million per quarter.
And with that, we'll take any questions you may have.
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Daniel Tamayo from Raymond James.
Congratulations to Jane on your retirement. I guess, first on the credit side. I apologize, I don't think I heard anything, but if I did, I apologize if I missed it, but just curious, you did Mike touch on the impact of the guaranteed and the NPLs. But just thoughts on where the net charge-offs and provision might go in 2026. And then if you have any update on the floor plan loan that had been giving you guys some issues where that stands at the end of the quarter as well.
Yes. The charge-off guidance we normally give is 25 to 30 basis points. And the floor plan credit, we have maybe $1.5 million left to resolve. Is that right, Brian?
Yes, I'll jump in there. Thanks, Mike. First, I'll just start in the fourth quarter for the dealer floor plan loan, we ended the year with a $2.5 million outstanding balance. So we're nearing resolution with just a number of cars left in the liquidation process. There was no additional reserve as noted previously, and we have just a small release about $80,000 in the quarter.
Since you mentioned the net charge-offs, there was a $2.1 million charge in the fourth quarter related to the dealer floor plan loan and within that 47 basis points, that was reported on an annualized basis. And I concur with Mike's guidance on the forecast moving forward.
Okay. Great. And as it relates to the provision or reserves with the reserves coming out over the last couple of quarters, just feel like a pretty good run rate for stability, just over 130 or do you think that still can trickle down?
Yes. I wouldn't say there's any change in our philosophy credit costs remain manageable. Reserve levels remained strong, consistent with peers slightly ahead in some cases at the 132, where we've seen emerging stress, we've already responded, whether that's through the specific reserves in prior quarters. We've kept our qualitative overlays in place. And overall, comfortable that the reserves just appropriate, reflecting where the risk is in the portfolio.
Okay. And maybe just changing gears here, but just as it relates to the loan sale that you're expecting here probably near term. Is that something you could see happening more in 2026 in terms of additional loans being moved off the balance sheet? Or is this kind of a one-off situation that you don't see recurring?
It's more of a one-off. We we really withdrew from that market, our branches and kind of our C&I commercial banking depository ground game. About 2 years ago, we sent customers letter, and this is kind of really one of the last act of the play. Mike McCuen is our Chief Banking Officer. He's on the line. Do you want to add anything for Daniel, Michael?
No, I think you covered it, Mike, taking those resources that Jim alluded to investing in the other markets that we have retail locations makes all the sense in the world for our business model.
Okay. Terrific. Appreciate it.
Thank you.
Your next question comes from the line of Karl Shepard from RBC Capital Markets.
Congrats, Jane. I guess I wanted to start on your loan growth expectations. It looks like you had pretty good production in some of the segments maybe you're targeting and then you had the payoff headwind. So I guess just kind of what's the buildup for loan growth in '26 and just kind of just talk about maybe health of the pipelines and what you're seeing in your market?
Yes. I think last year, we grew 8%, 5% without -- 5% without Center Bank. And I would expect that kind of loan growth to continue, although we really had elevated payoffs, probably in excess of over $200 million from the second half of the year to the first half of the year. So that created some pulp-able headwinds.
We feel like our business banking Mortgage could have a good year, although we'll sell that. And really, we just feel good about our commercial pipeline, commercial real estate and elsewhere. We had really led our construction portfolio a trite and we feel that is going to build and add probably $20-plus million of drawdowns a month.
We feel like we're well positioned typically, the first and the fourth quarter are a little slower for us than the second or third, and that's where we get most of our loan growth in a given year. But the payoffs are indeed a little elevated. And -- but I suspect just like we were here last year, I think we probably guided to maybe 5% to 7%, and we've got to 5%. And that's again, without the center bank.
And I think we're well positioned, and our teams are maturing, and we I think we get a little better every year.
Okay. And then I guess maybe one for Jim. Just on the buyback quite a bit of authorization out there now and stock is a little bit higher than maybe where it was in 4Q when you're active. Just how do you want us to think about that?
Yes. It's really more about capital deployment right now. There is a price sensitivity to it. We always operate on a grid so that we can -- and we use the same words every time. We want to keep a little bit of dry powder available if prices dip that's kind of why if you look back in the calendar year 2025, for a good part of the year, we were buying back anything and then the later part of the year, we stepped up the buybacks.
But right now, the capital ratio is we're just generating so much capital to easily self-capitalize loan growth at the level we wanted. So our future guidance is mid-single digits. We're generating far more capital than it takes to capitalize that kind of loan growth.
And so, we don't want to -- and I'll repeat [indiscernible] said this thing before, but we don't want to accelerate loan growth beyond what we think we can organically do. We do it at the right pace for our region, for our credit appetite, for our demographics, based on the rate environment. For all those reasons, the loan growth rate is where we wanted to be. And then we still generate a ton of capital.
And so we have to do something with that other than just like the capital ratio has got to [indiscernible] up, up. So that's why we are doing the buyback and we'll continue to do more this year.
Your next question comes from the line of Kelly Motta from KBW.
Congrats, Jane, on your retirement. Just to start off, I'd love to kick it off on margin. It came in quite a bit above where I had been expecting. You guys noted you had some payoffs. I'm just wondering if there was any loan fees in there or if that's a good run rate to go off of. And as we look ahead, I appreciate the commentary about being reinvestment from the HFS portfolio when that closes, but how we should be thinking about these dynamics here?
Yes, Kelly, it's Jim. Great question. Thanks. Yes, we were really pleased with the margin performance this quarter as well. We recall last quarter, we were giving guidance that we expected a dip. And first thought when we saw that margin coming in so strongly was is the dip actually happen the way we thought it was going to happen and it did. It did.
So the rate cuts hit the variable rate loan portfolio, the sulfur-based loan portfolio took that down. But you nailed it. We had some other things that offset that. And -- the part you [indiscernible] we had some payoffs. We had some paydowns in the loans that were previously on nonaccrual status. And when they did that some of the previously -- we recognize the interest on those loans that have been on that accrual.
And so that -- and some other factors together, we work together to offset that hit we took in the variable growth portfolio and kept the margin performance really strong in the fourth quarter. But looking ahead, we think that -- there a couple of times here in the fourth quarter in December. That's not fully reflected yet. We're going to feel that in the variable -- in the solar-based loan portfolio, the variable portfolio. So that's going to hit in the first quarter, dip at that a little bit, but then all the other factors that have been working to keep it going strongly, continued upward repricing to fixed rate loans, the macro swaps coming off of here, the remainder of that in 2026, including a big chunk in May, that will really help, but keep the margin up.
And so that's why we kind of have this forecast of drifting upward to around the 4% level in 2026. So I hope that gives you some additional.
That's super helpful. Maybe turning to the expenses. Q4 it was up about $1.5 million, I think. Just wondering if that was just kind of year-end true-ups. And then as we think ahead, how you guys are -- it seems like you're calling for pretty strong margin here, solid loan growth. So as we look ahead, your expectation for expenses, any places you're hiring -- and how we should think about that run rate?
Just the efficiency was certainly on the back of the revenue side. We're normally very, very good at the expense side in maintaining operating leverage and we have a nice little chart in our investor deck that shows that we're pretty good at putting our shoulder to the wheel. And what we'll need to do that in hustle this year, watch our FTE count closely.
That being said, we've invested pretty heavily in our Commercial Bank, our Equipment Finance Group, and we expect more production there, and we expect for that those investments to pay off for us. But we can do a little better job on the expense side as well. And we've invested pretty heavily, quite frankly, the last 2 years. I think -- yes, $25 million or so up over 2 years. And we were a little higher than we thought we would be, but that's just a matter of discipline and we're pretty disciplined group.
And Kelly, you mentioned there were true-ups. There were a couple of things that were one-off that has in the fourth quarter that are not part of our thinking going forward. So we have some contract terminations and some other things in addition to what we said in our prepared remarks about filling open positions to Mike talked about, about the staff increases. So a couple of those one-offs are not in our future forecast for operating expense going forward.
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Breese from Stephens Inc.
I had a couple of questions. Maybe first starting with the NIM. It sounds like the guidance is calling for around a 4% NIM by the end of the year. And I'm usually just a bit skeptical, the sustainability of 4% NIMs. And one thing we've been hearing a lot about this quarter is spread compression, both on the C&I and CRE front.
And so I guess I had a 2-part question, which is, one, how does the pipeline yield look? And what are you getting for spreads on new C&I and commercial real estate business? And then maybe just touch on expectations around deposit costs for 2026?
Yes. I'll hand it over to Mike McCuen in a minute for the loan expectations that -- I mean, when I look at our commercial variable and the new stuff we're putting on, it's 7.3% in the last quarter and commercial fixed is in the high 60s, even our indirect is in the high 60s.
So -- and that's like kind of at that 2.5-year point on the shoulder of the yield curve, and we like that. And so I don't know, replacement rates still look good. Even with rates down this past quarter, our commercial variable the replacement rate was low, but nevertheless, it was still positive.
Yes. I think just I'll interject quickly, and then Mike McCuen turn it over to you for just thoughts on the market, the spread, the spread compression I'll give that kind of real-time color.
But -- in the fourth quarter, we didn't see a real differential in the rates the work for the variable rate portfolio, the ones that are coming on, coming off. So that said from -- in the aggregate, there wasn't an evidence of a lot of spread compression in that portfolio. As Mike was talking about is all the fixed rate volumes still nicely repricing upward.
And because those are all repricing towards the middle of the curve, if the yield curve inflects a little bit, it would drop at the short end, we won't expect that dynamic a whole lot. And I think now we talked about that before. So -- but that's just a [indiscernible] portfolio. The ones that came on, came off, it was like a 1 basis point differential in the fourth quarter. So not a lot of evidence on that macro level of spread compression, but I'll turn it over to Mike to [indiscernible].
Yes, just to answer specifically on the segments, I would start with our business lending to the family-owned owner-operated business, we put a real focus on that about a year ago. And we're seeing healthy growth in that segment. I would say that's a prime, the prime [indiscernible] space business. I don't see that changing from a spread perspective.
Secondly, the Equipment Finance Group they're doing mostly fixed rate loans. Their yields are holding up pretty well. And then thirdly, I would say the commercial real estate business, that's a little trickier because as probably you heard from others, the agency markets, the insurance markets are very aggressive these days.
We have a pretty healthy pipeline and we have a number of construction loans that are converting to permanent markets. The balancing act is those spreads are compressed, and we're trying to maintain our discipline around the real estate business, not just from a rate perspective, but also from a structure, term, recourse, all those things that go into those decisions.
As our construction loans roll off, we have every chance to match those rates. We, in many cases, choose not to, and let those move on and then grow the construction loan portfolio, which, by the way, is up around $120 million over the last year, and that will lead to future funding. So that's a quick snapshot of why we're a little more comfortable based on the segments that we play in versus large corporate, investment grade, things like that.
Got it. Okay. So it still sounds like you're putting on loans accretive to where the average yield is and I'm assuming there's still some room to reprice deposits down. I guess, Jim, as we look to 4Q '26 and beyond, do you feel like there is momentum to carry the NIM above 4% as we get into 2027 with all else equal?
Yes. But I'll borrow the phrase everyone says that the crystal ball gets fuzzy that are out. And we usually don't give guidance that far to that anyway. But I know we've talked about this before, if we look ahead in the projection. And again, it's really funny. So I'll hedge again.
The NIM would hover in the low 4s in 2027, the current projection. So it depends on lots of factors and lots of things could change by between here and then. By then our Microsoft be fully off. And so we'll be the benefit of that. We think there's room to drop the deposit rates a little more. We've been pretty thoughtful about that, watching the ratio in the market that have been around us.
We -- in 2025, that was a big issue. We thought it is very difficult to fund the loan growth with deposit growth and drop rates at the same time and yet we did it very successfully in 2025. So I kind of think there's -- we think we can continue that in 2026 as well settle up the market as well.
Got it. Okay. And then last one before I'll hop back in the queue. Actually like you laid a few breadcrumbs on the stock buyback front, at least in the very near term, in the next 1 or 2 quarters, should we be penciling in $25 million, $30 million in buybacks per quarter?
It's hard for me to definitively say even the next few quarters because it is -- it's not entirely dependent on the stock price, but it's sensitive to the stock price. So if the price shoots up, we'll slow the buyback down. And it would not all be in the first half. If the price stays where [indiscernible] lower than a lot of it will be in the first half.
Even then, though, it may not all be in the first half. It will be -- we intend to use the authority and be fairly aggressive with it overall, but there's still price sensitivity to it.
[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Manuel Navas from Piper Sandler.
On the NIM, how big of a dip are we looking at this first quarter. Did you discuss how much the -- I might have missed it, how much the NPLs benefited the NIM this quarter, like a dollar amount or basis points in and in -- just kind of quantify what's going to come out of the NIM next quarter?
Yes. The NPLs were all hold about 3 basis points of total impact is a little bit bigger. I just the impact on that 1 portfolio because we spent a lot of time looking at the [indiscernible] portfolio in the fourth quarter to say, why didn't it the yield of that portfolio dropped the way we thought it was going to drop.
And the answer is what I said before, it did drop for the effect on silver, but it was offset, I think, like these nonaccruals and a couple of other factors, too. But the overall effect of the total NIM for the nonaccruals coming back was about 3 basis points for the fourth quarter. [indiscernible] what's the other part of your question?
And then from there, how big of a dip [indiscernible] in the first quarter?
Yes. The amount that dip we think is anywhere from 5 to 10 , I'm hedging that way because we always had our forecast is they're always within 5 or 10. I think -- yes, on the model going forward. And then it drifts upward around 5 basis points a quarter, it ends up not quite 5 basis a quarter, but it's just upward enough to end the year at around 4%.
And as those loans are sold your loan-to-deposit ratio ex those loans is like in the low 90s, you could be a little bit more aggressive on deposits, right?
Yes and yes. Thank you. [indiscernible] in that a big part of our thinking actually. We're happy to see that on to deposit ratio. And then these were securities we buy will be current rate. They won't be underwater. So they're perfectly available to sell for the liquidity to fund loan growth we wanted to course have ample borrowing capacity. So it's not -- liquidity is not an issue, but it does give us a little more liquidity, a little more dry powder to [indiscernible] future loan growth and then also not be so aggressive at the margin on deposit rates to fund the loan growth.
We're probably the...
Are there...
No, we're probably 2/3 of our peers in terms of the deposit beta over the last year in terms of cost of deposits. So if they're down 33, we're down about 22. And we've done that on purpose, and we've really probably kept them a little higher than we could because we wanted the growth, and we didn't want the borrowings.
And so we achieved both, and that's kind of the balance. But I think there's probably, in the long run, the trades go down more downward opportunities. But we'll keep trying to grow the deposits. The other thing is it's -- it also has to be a game of acquiring new accounts, noninterest-bearing, new checking, and we're trying to -- and we have a sales force that under Jane's leadership and Mike's leadership has really delivered that for us and we'll continue to beat that one.
Are there other impacts from the sale of these loans across OpEx across you're more focused away from the filling area, are there other impacts in the loan loss reserve. Anything that -- in those areas that we can start to plan for now?
It financially answer the impacts of loan loss reserve the mark all that was felt in the fourth quarter. That's all reflected in the financial already. Just in terms of operational expenses, not much. We've already, we have a couple of physical locations there. We exited a while ago. So there's nothing further from a facilities expense standpoint to come. But it does provide management bandwidth to refocus on other areas and Mike McCuen, I don't know if you want to comment on that more, that's more of how we run the business in.
No, we -- I mean, Philadelphia is a great market. It's also very greatly competitive, and we would not be -- the investment to really compete the way we would like to be too great, and that money can be used in other markets for producers indiscernible] the physical locations where we already have really good presence, and we want to grow those. So it's just a trade-off we made, and I think we'll see more profitable growth in some of those markets than we otherwise would. But nothing again Philadelphia. It's a great market. It's just there's a lot of competitors there.
And Manuel....
Sorry. Go ahead. Go ahead.
Yes. Just the financial effect, these were already relationships so we were deciding to exit it was kind of a slow bleed on the loan growth. It was a net against other loan growth, and that will be relive now that we've moved them to helper sale.
I appreciate some of the extra commentary.
Your next question comes from the line of Matthew Breese from Stephens Inc.
Again, I just had one more, but I want to be cognizant of everybody. The securities book has been in this kind of 350 to 365 range. But yields have been down for the last couple of quarters. Jim, you had mentioned buying some at-the-market type securities with the portfolio. So I'm assuming that's like a 4.75 pickup.
And then so I was hoping for maybe securities yields outlook for the first quarter and then cash flow estimates for the year I would think at some point here, either late this year or next year, we start to see a more aggressive pickup in securities yields, but I was hoping for some help there.
Yes. No, it's a great point. The portfolio has a duration of between 4 and 5 years. So that -- right now, the philosophy is just replace the runoff. And the opportunities we get -- the number I gave a moment ago when I talked about reinvestment, the reinvestment of the HFS loans upon a sale if [indiscernible] into securities was assuming you repurchase rate about 4.5%. But you're right. We just look at the other day, we see some opportunities like in more in the high 4s. It depends to today, but I was using a 4.5% rate just as a rule of thumb right now, but you see some pickup set opportunities for some [indiscernible] investments that are more like 4.75 right now. So that will naturally allow these secure portfolio to drift up as well. It's -- we're not in the position holds in the balance sheet right now is not where we want it. And so we're not really expanding it. We're just replacing the [indiscernible]. Does that help?
Yes. Just curious, is that 4- to 5-year duration? Is that good to use for 2026? I haven't quite done the math out on what that means for quarterly cash flows, but.
Yes. And I don't have -- yes, I don't have any...
It could be lumpy sometimes.
Yes, yes. It can be. And obviously, a lot of those are mortgage-backed securities. So a couple of years ago, rates elaborations all extended. Can you see if I have the duration of securities portfolio right now. Right now, the duration of securities portfolio is actually only 4.28, 4.28 in the fourth quarter. So there should be some repricing opportunities that rolls over.
Okay.
That concludes the question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Mike Price, President and CEO, for closing remarks.
Thank you, as always, for your interest in our company. Great questions. I look forward to being with a number of you over the course of the next quarter and -- we're excited about the future of our company. We're excited to grow it, maintain operating leverage, add to our fee businesses. That's a big goal.
And our regional model, really delivered good, low-cost deposit growth in each of our markets, the fund. I think our -- we have enough diversity of lending businesses. I think we're less worried about growing the loans long term than funding them with low-cost core deposits. So thank you for your time today, and day 1.
Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes today's call. Thank you all for joining. You may disconnect.